If one eats meat, in a very place where majority refrain from taking it, would the face be liable to punishment? What if a person takes part inside a protest for further Democratic space, which was proscribed through the Government, is that individual justified in his/her cause? Are the police justified to kill inside commission of crime in an attempt to protect innocent lives, with many different viewing taking of some other life regardless of the situation as wrong?

The above questions test our very fundamental values & principles as precisely what is considered Immoral by others is legal in line with the Laws on the land, and vice- versa.

Thus setting up a thin line between Morality & Law, sometimes so thin that is certainly indistinguishable in the other, even some consider them interdependent. But in varying circumstances, the road is clear with each governed by a values & principles.

According to Collins Dictionary, Morality could be the belief that some behavior is correct & acceptable which the other behavior is wrong. In broader terms is really a system of principles & values concerning people’s behavior, that’s generally accepted by society or by particular group.

Then if someone eats meat inside a place where majority abstains from using it due to their beliefs & principles, he/she are going to be considered immoral. Another example is if someone engages in pre-marital sex, in the society where marriage before sex is really a taboo, then they are also immoral.

By committing such taboos am i liable to be punished, perhaps there is any basis to punish all those who have gone contrary to the accepted norms set with the society. To be fair, these are generally principles which have guided our society before our Grandparents were born and served to be a yard stick for generations.

According to Wikipedia, Law is really a system of rules that happen to be created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to control behavior or perhaps in broader term a method that regulates and means that individuals or community go through the will in the state.

Hence, if one participates in an unlawful protest, regardless how right the issues are or align using innate beliefs & principles e.g. agitating for further Democratic space inside a country. They will face the entire force in the law as enshrined inside the constitution and enforced by relevant institutions.

But if an individual takes meat within a society where it’s actually a taboo, the person are going to be wrong based on the society but legally to the law or engages in pre-marital sex, your situation will still be precisely the same.

In many cases, what’s morally wrong from the society can be illegal, as an example in Islamic societies starting pre or extra- marital affairs is not just a sin but in addition illegal with punishment meted using the Quran. In such societies, it is hard to distinguish between Law & Morality as our Moral Compass forms the foundation in creating Laws that govern us and enforced by Institutions.

Some have gone further stating many laws passed really are guided by our Moral value, and that is true, by way of example what has been considered generally wrong through the society e.g. public nudity may be enacted & passed into law prohibiting such behavior with Consequences if violated.

In a real scenario, there is absolutely no line to differentiate between Law & Morality since they are interdependent and something serve as being a basis inside formation in the other. Good examples are countries with State Religion e.g. Islamic countries like Iran, Pakistan where Sharia law depending on the Quran forms the cornerstone of laws enacted from the Government.

But in modern Western Democratic countries, there exists a clear line between Law & Morality and therefore are independent of 1 another. For example Abortion is usually a taboo in numerous societies and laws enacted outlawing it. In the west, the Rationality of Law takes precedence as well as the mother contains the Right either to keep or terminate having a baby. Hence emphasis is within the Rights of your Individual compared to the collective conscience on the Society.

Just reported by users another man meat is yet another man’s poison, in Law & Morality what on earth is considered morally wrong in a single society is legally directly in another and the other way around. The thin line is the thing that keeps them from clashing with the other in matters of Values & Principles and ensuring a somehow balanced society guided through the Rule of Law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *